Apr
20
Some pleasant news yesterday: two of my co-authored papers are among the 15 most downloaded papers from our institutional open access repository during March. The first is our CSMR’10 paper about an empirical study investigating whether bad identifiers somehow relate to less good code quality (more details in a previous blog entry). The paper was already among the 15 most downloaded during February. The other paper is about how to better track the impact of code clones throughout the history of a system, and will be presented at the software clone workshop at ICSE in May.
More good news: the CSMR’10 paper also is in the top 15 downloads during April.
And even more good news: the cloning paper is in the top 15 downloads of May.
… and of August. Both papers have now been 3 months in the top 15.